EVY VS RIBBON

Skip the $499/mo minimum. Catch more cheaters.

Ribbon AI locks teams into a $499/mo Growth tier or $999/mo Business tier, scores candidates at the summary level (not per question), and gates ATS sync plus the API behind Enterprise. Evy is built around the interview itself: calibrated eye tracking, screen and camera recording, full-page activity, and a lockdown browser at $2 to $4 per interview with no monthly fee on pay-as-you-go.

Book a demo
THE TL;DR

Why teams pick Evy over Ribbon

Per-question rationale, not summary-only scoring

Ribbon's evaluation produces summary-level outputs (overall scores tied back to transcript moments) rather than per-question rationale. Evy scores every question against the rubric with the supporting evidence attached. That matters when you have to defend a hire-or-pass decision.

Published $2 to $4 per interview, no monthly fee

Ribbon's lowest tier is $499/mo (Growth, 2 seats, 2 roles, 200 included interviews) whether you run 5 interviews or 200, plus $3 per overage. Evy pay-as-you-go is $4 per interview with no monthly fee, dropping to $3 monthly or $2 annually if you scale.

ATS sync and API not gated to Enterprise

Ribbon's ATS integrations and API are gated to Enterprise (custom-quote tier) only. Growth and Business teams get the interviewing surface without sync or programmatic access. Evy ships native Greenhouse, Ashby, Lever, Workday, Workable, and BambooHR plus CSV at every tier.

FEATURE BY FEATURE

Feature-by-feature comparison

How Evy and Ribbon stack up on the things buyers ask about.

Anti-cheat

Evy
Calibrated eye tracking + screen + camera + full-page activity
Ribbon
Integrity Monitor: ChatGPT-style response pattern detection + dynamic follow-ups + optional video identity verification (Business tier). No eye tracking, no tab-switch detection.

Evaluation output

Evy
Per-question scoring with rationale and supporting evidence
Ribbon
Summary-level scoring with moments tied back to transcript; no per-question rationale

Pricing model

Evy
Pay-per-use $2 to $4/interview, no monthly fee
Ribbon
$499/mo (Growth) or $999/mo (Business) + $3/interview overage

Public pricing

Evy
Yes, published on /pricing
Ribbon
Yes, published on ribbon.ai/pricing

Starting price

Evy
$0 base + $4/interview PAYG
Ribbon
$499/mo base + $3/interview overage

Interview format

Evy
Conversational video with adaptive follow-ups
Ribbon
Voice-first; video for identity verification only and only on Business tier

Languages

Evy
20+ languages
Ribbon
10 languages

ATS integrations

Evy
Greenhouse, Ashby, Lever, Workday, Workable, BambooHR + CSV (at every tier)
Ribbon
45+ via Kombo unified API, but ATS sync is gated to Enterprise tier

API access

Evy
Available
Ribbon
Enterprise tier only

LLM dependency

Evy
Multi-vendor
Ribbon
OpenAI only (single-vendor risk per sub-processor list)

Time to launch

Evy
Minutes, self-serve, no demo required
Ribbon
7-day free trial, then monthly subscription commit

SOC 2

Evy
Yes
Ribbon
Type 1 (Type 2 in observation); auditor is Delve

GDPR

Evy
Yes
Ribbon
Yes; NYC Local Law 144 compliant; annual third-party bias audits by Holistic AI

Lockdown browser

Evy
Yes, restricts other apps and tabs
Ribbon
Not advertised

Best for

Evy
Teams that need anti-cheat without a monthly subscription
Ribbon
Teams running 200+ interviews/mo who want sourcing bundled in
ANTI-CHEAT BREAKDOWN

An interview you can cheat on isn't a screen.

The #1 thing Evy gets right and most AI interviewers get wrong: catching the candidates who run ChatGPT in another window. Here's the honest comparison.

Ribbon's approach

Integrity Monitor: ChatGPT-pattern detection + dynamic follow-ups

Ribbon's 'Integrity Monitor' is more specific than its marketing suggests, and worth crediting on what it actually does. It analyzes response patterns for structures that mimic AI-generated text (ChatGPT-style detection), uses dynamic follow-up questions to defeat scripted answers, and offers optional video capture for identity verification on the Business tier ($999/mo and up). What it does not include is calibrated eye tracking, tab-switch detection, or screen recording, and Ribbon does not publish what specific behaviors trigger an integrity flag. The evaluation side has its own constraint: Ribbon outputs summary-level scoring (overall ratings with transcript moments cited) rather than per-question rationale, which makes it harder to defend a hire-or-pass call to a hiring manager who asks 'why didn't this candidate clear question 4?' Underneath, Ribbon's stack is OpenAI-only as its single listed LLM sub-processor, which is a real single-vendor risk for buyers in regulated industries. For a team whose actual screening problem is candidates running ChatGPT in another window on a second monitor, ChatGPT-pattern detection alone is a starting point, not an answer.

Evy's anti-cheat stack

  • Per-session calibrated eye tracking
    Calibrated for each individual candidate so the gaze signal is meaningful, not a generic vision model that flags everyone. Detects when candidates look off-screen at a second device or read notes from another monitor.
  • Screen + camera recording
    Full screen capture of what the candidate sees and full camera capture of what they do. Every interview, on record, exportable for review. You see the evidence, not just a score.
  • Full-page activity detection
    Catches tab switches, copy-pastes, and window blurs: the actual signals of someone running ChatGPT in another window. Each event is timestamped and tied to the question being answered.
  • Lockdown browser mode
    Restricts other apps and tabs during the interview so the candidate stays in focus. Optional per role: turn it on for senior or technical screens where the stakes justify it.
An Integrity Monitor that watches one signal isn't a screen. Calibrated eye tracking on a recorded screen is evidence.
PRICING SHOWDOWN

Pricing, at the volumes that matter

Ribbon publishes three tiers on ribbon.ai/pricing: Growth at $499/mo (2 seats, 2 roles, 200 included interviews, $3 overage), Business at $999/mo (5 seats, 5 roles, 500 included interviews, $3 overage, white-label, video for identity verification, 6 voice choices), and Enterprise on a custom quote (unlimited, custom voices, dedicated CSM and engineer). Two important catches: ATS sync and API access are gated to Enterprise only, which means Growth and Business teams use Ribbon as a standalone tool without pushing results back into Greenhouse, Workday, or Lever. And on Growth you pay the full $499 even if you only run 5 interviews that month, locked into a monthly subscription. Evy pay-as-you-go is $4 per interview with no monthly fee (a quiet month costs you nothing), $3 per interview on a monthly seat, and $2 per interview on an annual seat. ATS sync ships at every tier.

50 interviews/mo

Evy$100 to $200
Ribbon$499 (Growth, paying for 200 you don't use)

200 interviews/mo

Evy$400 to $800
Ribbon$499 (Growth, at the included limit)

500 interviews/mo

Evy$1,000 to $2,000
Ribbon$999 (Business, at the included limit)

1000 interviews/mo

Evy$2,000 to $4,000
Ribbon$999 + $1,500 overage = $2,499

At low volumes, Ribbon's $499 monthly minimum is dead weight: you're paying for 200 interviews and running 50. At very high volumes, Ribbon's $3 overage rate is competitive with Evy's $3 monthly-seat rate, but you're still locked into the subscription, you still don't get ATS sync without an Enterprise upgrade, and you lose pay-per-use flexibility for the months your pipeline slows down. Evy charges only for the interviews you actually run and ships ATS sync at every tier.

SWITCHING STORIES

What teams say when they switch to Evy

Evy caught a candidate cheating that we 100% would have moved forward. That alone paid for the year.
VP of People
Set up an interview in 4 minutes, had 12 candidates done by Monday. This is the future.
Founder
Reduced our cost-per-hire by ~40%. Hard to argue with the math.
VP of Talent
QUESTIONS

Common questions about Ribbon vs Evy

Is Ribbon AI more expensive than Evy?
It depends on volume, but at low and mid volumes Ribbon is meaningfully more expensive. Ribbon's lowest tier is $499/mo (Growth) whether you run 5 interviews or 200, while Evy pay-as-you-go starts at $0 base plus $4 per interview. At 50 interviews per month, Ribbon costs $499 and Evy costs $200, roughly 2.5x. Only at very high volumes (500+ interviews/mo where Ribbon Business at $999 is at its included limit) does the gap close, and even then you're locked into a monthly subscription instead of paying only for what you use, and you still need to upgrade to Enterprise to get ATS sync and API access.
Does Ribbon AI have eye tracking?
No. Ribbon's Integrity Monitor analyzes response patterns for ChatGPT-style structures, uses dynamic follow-up questions to defeat scripted answers, and offers optional video capture for identity verification on the Business tier ($999/mo and up). It does not advertise calibrated eye tracking, tab-switch detection, or default screen recording. Evy publishes the full anti-cheat stack: per-session calibrated eye tracking, screen and camera recording on every interview, full-page activity detection with timestamps (tab switches, copy-pastes, window blurs), and an optional lockdown browser mode. If catching candidates who run ChatGPT in another window on a second monitor is the job, ChatGPT-pattern detection alone is not enough.
Can I switch from Ribbon to Evy?
Yes, and most teams are live the same week. Your role templates, interview questions, and scoring rubrics can be re-created in Evy in under an hour. Candidate records export as CSV. ATS integrations overlap heavily on mainstream connectors (Greenhouse, Ashby, Lever, Workday, BambooHR, SmartRecruiters) and Evy ships ATS sync at every tier, where Ribbon gates it to Enterprise. Because Evy is pay-as-you-go with no monthly minimum, there's no contract to wait out: you can run Ribbon and Evy in parallel for a single month and switch traffic over as confidence builds.
Does Ribbon AI publish pricing?
Yes. Ribbon publishes three tiers on ribbon.ai/pricing: Growth at $499/mo (2 seats, 2 roles, 200 included interviews), Business at $999/mo (5 seats, 5 roles, 500 included interviews, white-label, video for identity verification, 6 voice choices), and Enterprise on a custom quote. Both Growth and Business charge $3 per interview for overage. ATS integrations, API access, custom voices, and a dedicated CSM are gated to Enterprise only. Evy also publishes pricing on /pricing, but with a different model: $4 per interview pay-as-you-go (no monthly fee), $3 per interview on a monthly seat, $2 per interview on an annual seat, and ATS sync at every tier. Both companies are transparent on pricing. The differences are the monthly minimum and what's actually included at the lower tiers.
Which is better for low-volume hiring: Ribbon or Evy?
Evy, by a wide margin. If you're running 5 to 50 interviews per month, Ribbon's $499/mo Growth tier costs $499 every month no matter how few interviews you actually run. At 10 interviews, that's $49.90 per interview in effective cost. Evy pay-as-you-go at the same 10 interviews is $40 total ($4 x 10) and you don't pay a cent the months your pipeline goes quiet. For seasonal hiring, backfill-only roles, or early-stage startups running fewer than 100 interviews per month, the pay-as-you-go model is dramatically cheaper than any monthly subscription.
Which AI interviewer integrates with the most ATS systems?
Ribbon advertises 45+ ATS connectors via the Kombo unified API plus MCP-style integrations for Lever, Workday, Greenhouse, Ashby, SmartRecruiters, and Teamtailor. The catch is that ATS sync is gated to Ribbon's Enterprise tier (custom quote), so Growth ($499/mo) and Business ($999/mo) customers cannot push interview results back into their ATS. Evy ships native integrations with Greenhouse, Ashby, Lever, Workday, Workable, and BambooHR plus CSV upload as a universal fallback, at every tier. Honest read: if you need a long-tail connector like Eploy, Factorial, or PayCor and you're prepared to buy Ribbon's Enterprise tier, Ribbon's connector library is wider. If you're on a mainstream ATS, integration is not the deciding factor: anti-cheat methodology, evaluation depth, and whether sync ships at your tier are.
Is Ribbon's Integrity Monitor effective?
Honest answer: against a specific narrow threat, probably yes. Against the broader cheating problem, not on its own. Ribbon's Integrity Monitor analyzes response patterns for ChatGPT-style structures, uses dynamic follow-up questions to surface scripted answers, and adds optional video for identity verification on the Business tier. What it does not include: calibrated eye tracking, tab-switch detection, default screen recording, or a lockdown browser. Ribbon also evaluates at the summary level (with transcript moments cited) rather than per question with rationale, which makes appeals harder. And the system runs on OpenAI as its single listed LLM sub-processor (single-vendor risk for regulated buyers). Evy publishes the full stack (calibrated per-candidate eye tracking, screen and camera recording on every interview, tab-switch and copy-paste detection with timestamps, per-question scoring with evidence) so you can decide for yourself whether the signal will catch what you're worried about.

See the difference in 2 minutes.

Talk to Evy yourself. No $499 monthly minimum, no Enterprise upgrade to get ATS sync, no sales cycle. Just an actual interview so you can see calibrated anti-cheat in action.

Book a demo