Classet's Joy is an AI phone screen, fast and friendly, but voice-only, with no camera, no screen, and no way to catch a candidate reading from ChatGPT. Evy runs real video interviews with calibrated anti-cheat and $2–4/interview pricing, no per-job fees.
Joy is voice-only. There's no camera, no screen share, no eye tracking. A candidate can read ChatGPT's answer aloud and you'll never know. Classet's own advice for trades is to 'add a brief practical test' after the phone screen, a tacit admission that self-reported experience over the phone is the limit. Evy runs full video with calibrated eye tracking and full-page activity monitoring on every interview.
Classet Flex bills $190/week per active job (or $700/mo flat) for 50 monthly interviews, then $4 per overage. Evy is a flat $2–4 per interview across every role: open ten reqs and you pay for the interviews, not the postings.
Hiring managers reviewing a Classet candidate get an audio recording and an AI-generated resume. With Evy they get the camera feed, the screen recording, the full activity log, and the AI's structured scorecard. Actual evidence, not just words.
How Evy and Classet stack up on the things buyers ask about.
The #1 thing Evy gets right and most AI interviewers get wrong: catching the candidates who run ChatGPT in another window. Here's the honest comparison.
Phone-only voice screening; no camera, no screen, no cheat detection possible
Classet's Joy is, by design, an AI phone call. The candidate picks up their cell phone and talks. That format is genuinely useful for accessibility: frontline workers in HVAC, plumbing, electrical, healthcare, hospitality, and warehousing don't always have a laptop or a quiet room with a webcam. But the trade-off is structural. A phone call has no camera, no screen share, no eye tracking, no tab-switch detection, and no lockdown. A candidate can keep ChatGPT open on a second device and read its answers verbatim, and the system has no signal to flag it. Classet's own marketing does not claim any cheat detection or integrity monitoring, and their own published guidance for trades customers is to 'add a brief practical test' after the phone screen, a tacit admission that self-reported experience over the phone is the validation limit. For trades and skilled-labor roles where the cost of a bad hire is measured in turnover, callbacks, and warranty claims, a screening you can pass with a chatbot in your lap is a real risk.
When you hire trades workers based on a phone call, you're trusting they didn't have help. With Evy, you don't have to.
Classet publishes pricing on classet.ai, which is rare for this category. Classet Flex is $190/week per active job (or $700/month flat), capped at 50 AI phone interviews per role with $4/interview overage, no contract, live in under a day. ATS Sync starts at $1,995/month with integration to 100+ ATSs (via Kombo), unlimited jobs and seats, typical go-live 1–5 weeks. Joy Sync per-completed-interview is marketed at $2.50–$4 with no per-seat or integration fees. Because Flex bills per role rather than per interview, the math gets expensive fast for teams running multiple reqs at once.
At 200 interviews a month spread across four open roles, Classet Flex runs north of $3,000. Evy is $400–$800, and you actually get the video, the screen capture, and the eye-tracking evidence to back the hire.
Evy caught a candidate cheating that we 100% would have moved forward. That alone paid for the year.
Set up an interview in 4 minutes, had 12 candidates done by Monday. This is the future.
Reduced our cost-per-hire by ~40%. Hard to argue with the math.
Talk to Evy yourself. She'll ask about you, your team, and what your hiring looks like, all on video, with the same anti-cheat stack your candidates would face.