HeyMilo gives you one black-box 'trust score' inside a deep staffing-ATS suite, with pricing kept off the website. Evy gives you calibrated eye tracking, screen and camera capture, full-page activity, and a lockdown browser at a published $2 to $4 per interview.
HeyMilo's trust score rolls everything (off-screen glances, multiple voices, deepfake detection, tab switches, copy-paste, phone-detection) into one opaque number. Evy publishes its four-component stack: calibrated eye tracking, screen and camera recording, full-page activity detection, and lockdown browser. Every signal is timestamped against the question that triggered it.
HeyMilo does not publish pricing on heymilo.ai. Every quote starts with a sales call that asks team size, ATS, and monthly hires. Evy publishes pay-as-you-go ($4), monthly ($3), and annual ($2) rates on /pricing today.
HeyMilo's edge is depth in staffing ATSs (Bullhorn, Avionte, JobDiva, Tracker RMS, Ceipal). Evy is purpose-built for one thing: catching cheaters and surfacing your top 20% of candidates, with self-serve setup in minutes.
How Evy and HeyMilo stack up on the things buyers ask about.
The #1 thing Evy gets right and most AI interviewers get wrong: catching the candidates who run ChatGPT in another window. Here's the honest comparison.
'Trust score' rolling six signals into one undisclosed number
HeyMilo's integrity layer is more detailed than its marketing suggests. The company advertises detection for off-screen glances, multiple voices, AI-generated (deepfake) responses, tab switching, copy-paste, and a separate phone-detection signal. The problem is that all six roll up into a single 'trust score' whose weighting and thresholds are not published anywhere on heymilo.ai. HeyMilo holds a SOC 2 Type I attestation (issued April 2025 by Delve, with Type II reported in progress) and runs third-party bias audits, both legitimate. But a trust score is only useful if you know what it is measuring on a given candidate. There is no per-question breakdown of which signal fired, and buyers report the methodology is shared under NDA during procurement. You get a number; you cannot easily appeal a candidate's score with evidence.
A trust score you cannot audit isn't a screen. It's a vibe.
HeyMilo does not publish pricing on heymilo.ai. Every quote starts with a demo form that asks team size, ATS, monthly hires, and applicants per month, then a sales cycle that buyers report typically runs two to four weeks before a number is even shared. Third-party listings have leaked figures in the $4 to $8 per interview range depending on volume and contract length, but none of that is committed to on the vendor's own site, so realized pricing depends on what your procurement team is willing to push back on.
If you have to schedule a 30-minute call to learn what a tool costs, you already know two things: the price isn't simple, and it isn't cheap. Evy publishes every rate at /pricing. No demo, no procurement song-and-dance, just the number.
Evy caught a candidate cheating that we 100% would have moved forward. That alone paid for the year.
Set up an interview in 4 minutes, had 12 candidates done by Monday. This is the future.
Reduced our cost-per-hire by ~40%. Hard to argue with the math.
Talk to Evy in 2 minutes. No demo form, no team-size question, no sales cycle. Just an actual interview so you can see what calibrated anti-cheat feels like.