EVY VS INTERVIEWER.AI

Conversational, calibrated, and no credit math.

Interviewer.AI is Singapore-based, ~12 employees flat since 2022, last priced round in 2019, with no SOC 2, no ISO 27001, no HIPAA, no NYC Local Law 144 bias audit, and an 'Interview Fraud Checklist' that's substantially less mature than what Talview or AI Interviewer ship. Their core format is still async one-way video, capped at 10 minutes per interview, and conversational AI lives behind their $50K/yr Enterprise tier. Evy ships calibrated eye tracking, screen + camera, full-page activity, lockdown browser, and conversational follow-ups on every interview at $2–4 each, no subscription required.

Book a demo
THE TL;DR

Why teams pick Evy over Interviewer.AI

Conversational by default, not Enterprise-only

Interviewer.AI's Essential (~$500/yr) and Professional (~$850/yr) plans run async one-way video, where the candidate records responses to fixed prompts alone, capped at 10 minutes per interview. Their conversational 'AI Avatar' format launched in 2025 but the truly enterprise-grade conversational features sit at the $50K/yr tier. Evy is conversational with adaptive follow-ups on every interview, at every price.

Anti-cheat that's actually a stack, not a checklist

Interviewer.AI's anti-cheat is the 'Interview Fraud Checklist' (multiple faces in frame, AI-generated text/lip-sync flags). No browser lockdown, no screen-share detection, no external-monitor detection, no calibrated eye tracking, no NYC LL 144 bias audit, no SOC 2, no ISO 27001, no HIPAA. Evy ships calibrated per-session eye tracking, screen + camera, full-page activity (tab switches, copy-pastes, window blurs), and lockdown browser on every interview.

Pay-per-interview, no credit math, no annual lock-in

Interviewer.AI sells annual subscriptions bundled with credits ($50K/yr Enterprise; ~$500/yr Essential at 50 candidate responses; ~$850/yr Professional). Credits don't roll over indefinitely. Evy is $2–4 per interview flat, no subscription, no expiring credits, scales from one interview to ten thousand on the same invoice math.

FEATURE BY FEATURE

Feature-by-feature comparison

How Evy and Interviewer.AI stack up on the things buyers ask about.

Anti-cheat

Evy
Calibrated eye tracking + screen + camera + full-page activity (every tier)
Interviewer.AI
'Interview Fraud Checklist' (multiple faces, AI-generated text/lip-sync flags). No browser lockdown, no screen-share detection, no external-monitor detection.

Interview format

Evy
Conversational video with adaptive follow-ups, every tier
Interviewer.AI
Primarily async one-way recorded video. Conversational 'AI Avatar' launched 2025; enterprise-grade conversational features at $50K/yr tier.

Interview length

Evy
No 10-minute cap
Interviewer.AI
10-minute cap per interview (recurring AppSumo / G2 complaint)

Lockdown browser

Evy
Yes, restricts other apps and tabs
Interviewer.AI
Absent from public materials

Languages

Evy
20+ languages
Interviewer.AI
English, Mandarin, Indonesian, Polish, Spanish. STT accuracy degrades for non-native English speakers (acknowledged by company).

ATS integrations

Evy
Greenhouse, Ashby, Lever, Workday, Workable, BambooHR + CSV
Interviewer.AI
Greenhouse (API key handshake via their support, not self-serve marketplace), Zapier, LinkedIn Jobs, Calendly. No Workday, SAP, Lever, BambooHR, iCIMS, Ashby, or native Slack.

Compliance

Evy
Documented anti-cheat and data handling per stack component
Interviewer.AI
GDPR-aligned privacy policy. No SOC 2 (Type I or II), no ISO 27001, no HIPAA, no NYC Local Law 144 bias audit summary, no EU AI Act conformity statement.

Funding stage

Evy
Established product with paying customers
Interviewer.AI
~$1.14M total (last priced round 2019). No Series A. Operating on 2019 seed for 6+ years.

Team size

Evy
Established team, multiple paying customers
Interviewer.AI
~11–12 employees, flat since 2022. CTO Boon Khai Lim's LinkedIn now reads 'Meta', signaling likely departure (not officially confirmed by company).

Customer base

Evy
Live with paying customers across verticals and geographies
Interviewer.AI
~850 customers self-reported (~200 monthly active). Mostly APAC and MENA: Emaar (UAE), AIA Insurance, Axis Bank (India), Rogers Group (Mauritius). No Fortune 500 US logos.

Third-party reviews

Evy
Customer quotes and references available
Interviewer.AI
G2: ~14 reviews (4.4–4.6). Capterra: ~20 reviews. Trustpilot: ~10. Glassdoor: essentially empty (2 reviews).

Subscription required

Evy
No, pay-as-you-go available
Interviewer.AI
Yes. Annual or quarterly subscription on Essential and Professional. 1-month free trial, no credit card.

Time to launch

Evy
Minutes. Self-serve, no demo required.
Interviewer.AI
1-month free trial, then paid subscription required

Best for

Evy
Teams that want layered anti-cheat at any volume without subscriptions
Interviewer.AI
APAC / MENA SMB and mid-market teams doing early-stage async video screening at low volume
ANTI-CHEAT BREAKDOWN

An interview you can cheat on isn't a screen.

The #1 thing Evy gets right and most AI interviewers get wrong: catching the candidates who run ChatGPT in another window. Here's the honest comparison.

Interviewer.AI's approach

'Interview Fraud Checklist' (basic multi-face / AI-generated content flags) on async one-way video. No browser lockdown, no calibrated eye tracking.

Interviewer.AI's anti-cheat is the 'Interview Fraud Checklist': basic flags for multiple faces in frame and AI-generated text or lip-sync. There's no browser lockdown, no screen-share detection, no external-monitor detection (features that competitors like Talview and AI Interviewer ship as standard), no calibrated per-session eye tracking, no formal published methodology, and no third-party audit. The bigger structural issue is the format: Interviewer.AI's core product is async one-way video, where the candidate is alone with the recorder for up to 10 minutes per interview and can keep ChatGPT open in a second tab the entire time. Their 'AI Avatar' conversational format launched in 2025, but the enterprise-grade conversational features live at the $50K/yr tier. On the compliance side: no SOC 2 (Type I or II), no ISO 27001, no HIPAA, no NYC Local Law 144 bias audit summary published, no EU AI Act conformity statement, and the 'Explainable AI' framing is a marketing artifact rather than a third-party audit. When anti-cheat is a checklist on top of an async format, lower-tier buyers ship interviews they can't actually trust.

Evy's anti-cheat stack

  • Per-session calibrated eye tracking, included at every tier
    Calibrated for each individual candidate so the gaze signal is meaningful, not a generic vision model that flags everyone. Detects when candidates look off-screen at a second device or read notes from another monitor. Included on every interview, whether you're paying $2, $3, or $4. Not gated to a Pro tier.
  • Screen + camera recording
    Full screen capture of what the candidate sees and full camera capture of what they do. Every interview, on record, exportable for review, so you see the evidence rather than a checklist after the fact.
  • Full-page activity detection
    Catches tab switches, copy-pastes, and window blurs (the actual signals of someone running ChatGPT in another window). Each event is timestamped and tied to the question being answered, so a flag is something you can audit, not just a number.
  • Lockdown browser mode
    Restricts other apps and tabs during the interview so the candidate stays in focus. Optional per role: turn it on for senior or technical screens where the stakes justify it.
  • Conversational by default, not Enterprise-only
    Evy runs adaptive follow-ups on every interview at every tier. Interviewer.AI's published lower tiers are async one-way video with a 10-minute cap. The async one-way format is structurally easier to cheat on, because the candidate is alone with the recorder and a second screen the entire time.
Anti-cheat shouldn't be a checklist on top of an async recorder.
PRICING SHOWDOWN

Pricing, at the volumes that matter

Interviewer.AI publishes one of the most transparent pricing pages in the category. Essential (~$500/yr, roughly $53/mo) includes 50 candidate responses, 3 live jobs, 1 admin, 3 users. Professional (~$850/yr, roughly $67/mo) is for growing teams with expanded credits. Enterprise is $50,000/yr with 2 admins, 10 users, 3 accounts, 1,000 live jobs, 3 career pages, and the full feature set including Deep AI Score, Content Relevancy, and Interview Fraud Detection (listed at '3,000+ employees'). A 1-month free trial requires no credit card. Honest framing: at the absolute bottom tier Interviewer.AI's per-interview cost ($500/yr ÷ 50 responses ≈ $10/interview, or roughly $1.06/interview on the larger response packs) can look cheap on paper, but it's bundled with an annual subscription and the response pool expires unused. Beyond ~50–200 responses you're talking to Enterprise sales for a $50K/yr custom quote. Evy is pay-as-you-go at $2–4 per interview with no subscription required.

50 interviews/mo (600/yr)

Evy$100–$200/mo
Interviewer.AIFar exceeds Essential's 50-response allowance and Professional's published scope. Enterprise tier ($50,000/yr) required.

200 interviews/mo (2,400/yr)

Evy$400–$800/mo
Interviewer.AIEnterprise required ($50,000/yr published tier, full feature set, 3,000+ employee target)

500 interviews/mo

Evy$1,000–$2,000/mo
Interviewer.AIEnterprise required ($50,000/yr published; custom quote beyond that)

1000 interviews/mo

Evy$2,000–$4,000/mo
Interviewer.AIEnterprise required ($50,000/yr published; custom quote beyond that)

Interviewer.AI's published Essential and Professional plans are designed for low-volume async video screening (50 responses on the floor tier). The moment your hiring picks up, or you want anything beyond the basic 'Interview Fraud Checklist', you're at the $50,000/yr Enterprise tier. Evy's $2–4/interview scales from your first interview to your ten-thousandth with the same number on the invoice.

SWITCHING STORIES

What teams say when they switch to Evy

Evy caught a candidate cheating that we 100% would have moved forward. That alone paid for the year.
VP of People
Set up an interview in 4 minutes, had 12 candidates done by Monday. This is the future.
Founder
Reduced our cost-per-hire by ~40%. Hard to argue with the math.
VP of Talent
QUESTIONS

Common questions about Interviewer.AI vs Evy

Is Interviewer.AI more expensive than Evy?
It depends entirely on volume. At their lowest published tier, Interviewer.AI's Essential plan is roughly $500/yr for 50 candidate responses (about $10/interview), and Professional is roughly $850/yr. At very small volume that can look competitive, but those are annual subscriptions where the response pool expires unused, and conversational AI Avatar interviews use additional credits. The moment you outgrow the response cap, you're at their $50,000/yr Enterprise tier. Evy is $2 per interview on an annual seat, $3 on a monthly seat, $4 pay-as-you-go, with no subscription required and no expiring credits. At any meaningful volume Evy is dramatically cheaper, and there's no annual commitment to access it.
Does Interviewer.AI have eye tracking?
Not in the way Evy does. Interviewer.AI ships an 'Interview Fraud Checklist' that flags multiple faces in frame and AI-generated text or lip-sync, plus an 'Explainable AI' framework that reports per-feature contributions to the final score across four 'Narrow AI' sub-scores (Professionalism, Sociability, Communication, Energy). Their 'Explainable AI' page references facial-expression and behavioural cues from video, but there's no per-session calibrated eye tracking that establishes a gaze baseline for each candidate and flags off-screen glances in real time, and no browser lockdown, screen-share detection, or external-monitor detection. Evy publishes its full stack (calibrated eye tracking, screen and camera recording, full-page activity detection, lockdown browser) and includes it on every interview at every tier.
How does Interviewer.AI's pricing actually work?
Interviewer.AI publishes three tiers. Essential is roughly $500/yr ($53/mo equivalent) for 50 candidate responses, 3 live jobs, 1 admin, and 3 users. Professional is roughly $850/yr ($67/mo equivalent) for growing teams with expanded credits. Enterprise is $50,000/yr with 2 admins, 10 users, 3 accounts, 1,000 live jobs, 3 career pages, and the full feature set (Deep AI Score, Content Relevancy, Interview Fraud Detection), targeted at 3,000+ employee organizations. A 1-month free trial requires no credit card. Unused responses expire with the subscription period. There is no pay-as-you-go option. Evy bills by the interview at $2–4 with no annual commitment.
Why is Interviewer.AI's conversational format gated higher up the tier ladder?
Because their core legacy product is async one-way video. Candidates record responses to fixed prompts alone, capped at 10 minutes per interview (a recurring complaint on AppSumo and G2). The 'AI Avatar' conversational interview launched in 2025 and is their first genuinely conversational offering, but the enterprise-grade conversational features live at the $50,000/yr Enterprise tier. The async one-way format is also structurally easier to cheat on, because the candidate is alone with the recorder and a second screen the entire time. Evy includes conversational follow-ups on every interview at the same flat $2–4 rate.
Can I use Interviewer.AI without a subscription?
Not in production. Interviewer.AI offers a 1-month free trial with no credit card required, but beyond that the published plans are annual subscriptions: Essential (~$500/yr), Professional (~$850/yr), or Enterprise ($50,000/yr). There is no pay-as-you-go option, and unused response capacity expires with the subscription period, so you commit before you know your actual interview volume. Evy is pay-as-you-go at $4 per interview with no subscription required. Monthly and annual seats just lower the per-interview price for teams that already know their volume.
Is Interviewer.AI a good fit for high-volume hiring?
Their published lower tiers aren't designed for it. Essential's 50-response allowance is sized for very low-volume hiring, and the platform's 10-minute interview cap (a recurring G2 and AppSumo complaint) limits it to early-stage screening anyway. Beyond that you're at the $50,000/yr Enterprise tier, where ATS integrations like Workday, SAP, Lever, BambooHR, iCIMS, and Ashby still aren't supported (their ATS surface is limited to Greenhouse via support-managed API key, Zapier, LinkedIn Jobs, and Calendly). Evy holds the same flat $2–4 per interview at any volume, integrates with Greenhouse, Ashby, Lever, Workday, Workable, and BambooHR on every paid tier, and supports CSV upload as a universal fallback.
How does Evy compare to Interviewer.AI on conversational interviews?
Evy is conversational by default on every interview, at every tier: adaptive follow-ups, real-time back-and-forth, calibrated anti-cheat throughout. Interviewer.AI's published lower tiers run async one-way video, where the candidate records responses to fixed prompts alone with no live follow-ups, capped at 10 minutes per interview. Their conversational 'AI Avatar' (launched 2025) is their first genuinely agentic offering, but the enterprise-grade conversational features live at the $50,000/yr tier. The async one-way format is also structurally easier to cheat on, because the candidate is alone with the recorder and a second screen the entire time.
What's the state of Interviewer.AI as a company in 2026?
Honest read: Interviewer.AI is Singapore-based, founded 2018 out of Entrepreneur First, with ~11–12 employees that has been flat since 2022. Total disclosed funding is roughly $1.14M per PitchBook (an Entrepreneur First pre-seed in Jan 2019 and a seed of ~$611K–$730K in Aug 2019), with no priced round since 2019 and no Series A. CTO Boon Khai Lim's LinkedIn now reads 'Meta', signaling likely departure (not officially confirmed). Customer base is ~850 self-reported (~200 monthly active), concentrated in APAC and MENA: Emaar (UAE), AIA Insurance (Indonesia/Vietnam), The Trade Desk APAC, Axis Bank (India), Rogers Group (Mauritius), plus NUS and NTU. No named Fortune 500 US logos. Compliance is thin: no SOC 2 (Type I or II), no ISO 27001, no HIPAA, no NYC Local Law 144 bias audit summary, no EU AI Act conformity. G2 has ~14 reviews (4.4–4.6 average), Glassdoor is essentially empty (2 reviews). It's a real product with real customers in its geographies; the question for buyers is whether the funding pace, headcount, compliance posture, and US enterprise presence match what they need.

See the difference in 2 minutes.

Talk to Evy yourself. No credit math, no tier gates, no subscription required. Just a real conversational interview with calibrated anti-cheat on from the first second.

Book a demo