By Adrian Pascual•Hiring insight•Published 
Top 5 fasthire.io Alternatives in 2026
Finding interview proctoring software that pairs fraud detection and compliance controls, so without locking teams into enterprise contracts is harder than expected. Most vendors require custom quotes, slow onboarding, or restrict key monitoring features to bundled enterprise tiers that do not fit smaller teams. This comparison reviews price, automation, and audit features across five interview proctoring tools so recruiters can match a platform to staffing scale and workflow fit.
Table of Contents
Evy
At a Glance
Calibrated eye tracking runs during interviews to record gaze patterns and full-page activity for integrity monitoring. The system captures full recordings and transcripts while conversational AI adapts follow-up questions. Pricing uses per interview and seat models so teams can scale screening without large upfront contracts.
Core Features
Evy runs conversational AI interviews that follow up dynamically based on candidate responses and resume data, and it produces full recordings and searchable transcripts. The platform enforces calibrated eye tracking and optional lockdown browser mode while logging full-page activity for audit trails. Candidates self-schedule interviews and results feed into ATS and HR workflows through API or CSV.
Key Differentiator
Evy places calibrated eye tracking directly inside live conversational assessments so gaze and activity appear alongside scored responses and recordings.
Pros
Evy combines a dedicated integrity layer with typical screening outputs. The platform gives you calibrated eye tracking, full interview recordings, and activity logs that hiring teams can review alongside AI scoring. Pricing appears transparent, with per interview and seat options that let recruiters buy small batches or commit to monthly or annual seats. Integration with ATS and HRIS keeps candidate data flowing into existing pipelines so recruiters do not juggle manual exports.
Cons
- Requires candidates to calibrate eye tracking before interviews, which may not suit all candidates or roles.
Notable Integrations
- ATS via API and CSV
- HR tools
- HRIS and recruitment platforms
Who It's For
Evy fits organizations hiring at scale that want stronger fraud detection during remote screening. Staffing agencies, talent teams at startups, and internal HR departments running large applicant volumes will get the most value. Teams that already use an ATS and want automatic import and export will avoid duplicate work.
Unique Value Proposition
Starting rates at $8 per interview with full feature access make Evy a pay as you go screening option that includes ATS integration. That pricing model reduces procurement friction for teams that need to screen many candidates without committing to enterprise contracts. Combining the per interview model with integrity monitoring helps teams budget screening costs while keeping a recorded audit trail.
Real World Use Case
The vendor reports a tech startup reduced time to hire by 50% after automating first round technical interviews and using eye tracking to detect fraud. Using Evy, the company scaled screening for technical and sales roles, kept interview quality consistent, and shortened recruiter review time by focusing on scored recordings.
Pricing
Starting at $8 per interview for pay as you go. Monthly seat pricing drops to $5 per interview while annual seats go to $2 per interview. All plans include full feature access and ATS integration.
Website: https://evy.io
Hirevue
At a Glance
The vendor reports support for over 40 languages, making global hiring workflows practical for international teams. According to the company, Hirevue meets FedRAMP, SOC 2 Type 2, and ISO/IEC 27001 security standards. It combines video interviewing, assessments, and conversational AI into a single, end-to-end hiring stack.
Core Features
Hirevue pairs AI-powered video interviewing with a skills validation and assessment builder, letting teams run recorded and live interview workflows. The platform includes virtual job tryouts, game-based assessments, technical and language proficiency tests, and AI hiring agents for guided interviewing. Workflow automation handles scheduling and candidate engagement while connectors keep data flowing into major ATS systems.
Key Differentiator
The product targets large-scale hiring programs that need both language coverage and enterprise controls. That language support and the listed certifications aim to reduce friction for multinational recruitment. The vendor positions the platform as a single system to move candidates from assessment to interview to ATS handoff.
Pros
Hirevue delivers an integrated mix of interview recording, structured assessments, and candidate engagement tools that reduce manual scheduling overhead. Its ATS connectors and listed enterprise security standards make it easier for HR teams to embed assessments into existing hiring systems. Global language support and a stated emphasis on bias reduction help recruiters run volume programs across regions.
Cons
- Third-party reviews stress a need for clear AI decision-making explanations and ongoing bias mitigation efforts.
- The feature set is broad, so expect a nontrivial onboarding and training period for recruiters and hiring managers.
- Pricing is not publicly disclosed, which can complicate budgeting for smaller teams or pilot projects.
When It May Not Fit
Organizations without dedicated integration resources will find setup demanding, since the platform often requires enterprise configuration and ATS mapping. Small or early-stage teams with tight budgets may prefer transparent, lower-cost alternatives. Buyers who require fully auditable, human-only decision records may find the AI components produce additional governance work.
Notable Integrations
Hirevue lists out-of-the-box connectors to these ATS and HR systems:
- Workday
- SAP
- Oracle
- Smart Recruiters
These integrations help push candidate assessments and interview records into existing talent workflows.
Who It's For
Recruiters and HR professionals at large organizations that run high-volume or global hiring programs will find the platform most relevant. Talent teams that must meet enterprise security and compliance requirements will appreciate the stated certifications. Smaller teams or companies seeking simple, low-cost tools are not the intended audience.
Real World Use Case
According to the company, a multinational client runs thousands of virtual interviews annually using Hirevue. That program uses virtual job tryouts and automated scheduling to reduce time-to-hire and to centralize assessment data. The platform then feeds shortlisted candidate records into the enterprise ATS for final-stage recruiting.
Pricing
Pricing is not publicly disclosed and follows an enterprise SaaS model with custom quotes. Expect tiering based on modules, scale, language support, and integration scope. Procurement typically involves a formal sales engagement and contract negotiation for large deployments.
Website: https://hirevue.com
Talview
At a Glance
Talview says its multi-layered AI trust architecture and agentic AI detect complex fraud attempts and escalate only genuine risks. The vendor positions the product for high-stakes exams and regulated hiring, with certification claims including ISO 27001 and SOC2. The platform targets large-scale assessment programs and enterprise recruitment workflows.
Core Features
Talview combines AI-powered remote proctoring that monitors behavior, identity, and the test environment with multiple proctoring modes such as Alvy AI Proctor, automated record and review, and live proctoring. Candidate identity checks use face and voice authentication and a secure browser prevents unauthorized access during assessments. The system also integrates with common ATS and LMS platforms to fit existing hiring and learning workflows.
Key Differentiator
That AI trust architecture focuses on reducing false flags and surfacing only credible risks, which reduces the volume of manual reviews for exam administrators and recruiters. The platform layers behavioral signals, identity verification, and environmental checks to correlate suspicious patterns. This layered approach is the main operational difference versus simpler rule-based proctoring tools.
Pros
Talview groups multiple proctoring options in one product so teams can pick live, automated, or record-and-review modes for different use cases. The product lists enterprise security and privacy standards such as GDPR and CCPA, which matters for regulated assessments and cross-border hiring. Integrations with Moodle, Canvas, SAP, Workday, and common ATS products let recruitment and L&D teams move results into existing systems without rekeying data.
Cons
- Third-party or human escalation is used for flagged sessions, which may lengthen review times for large batches of assessments.
- Pricing is not publicly listed and requires a sales discussion, which can slow procurement for smaller organizations.
- The breadth of features adds setup complexity and requires training to operate effectively in complex exam or enterprise environments.
When It May Not Fit
Small companies running occasional hiring events will likely find the sales process and custom pricing burdensome. Teams that need a turnkey, self-serve proctoring tool with clear per-seat pricing may prefer a simpler vendor. Organizations without staff available for proctor configuration and reviewer training should plan for onboarding time before scaling.
Notable Integrations
Connects with LMS and ATS systems including Moodle, Canvas, D2L, SAP, Workday, Greenhouse, Cornerstone, and EdX.
Who It's For
Organizations conducting high-stakes assessments or regulated hiring that must meet strict security and compliance requirements. Typical buyers include universities, certification bodies, healthcare licensing authorities, and large enterprises running volume recruitment across countries. Teams that already use major LMS or ATS platforms will see the most practical fit.
Real World Use Case
A global university uses Talview to proctor online licensure exams and preserve accreditation requirements, while a multinational corporation runs automated AI interviews across countries to centralize candidate risk review. In both cases, teams reduce manual triage by routing only escalated sessions to human reviewers.
Pricing
Pricing is not publicly available. Talview requires contacting sales for custom quotes based on assessment volume, proctoring mode mix, and compliance needs. Expect enterprise negotiation for regulated or high-volume deployments.
Website: https://talview.com
Jobma
At a Glance
Jobma reports a 70% reduction in time-to-hire for a cited customer workflow. The platform combines automated AI interviews, live video, and structured assessments to handle large candidate volumes. It also advertises ISO, SOC 2, GDPR, and CCPA certifications for enterprise data control.
Core Features
Jobma supports one way video interviewing, live video with recording, and autonomous AI driven interviews with real time proctoring. The platform bundles written, audio, coding, and language assessments with AI driven candidate scoring and analytics to rank applicants. It also offers candidate management, team collaboration, and integration points with ATS and HRIS systems.
Key Differentiator
Jobma focuses on AI driven automation plus broad enterprise integrations and compliance. That combination targets HR organizations that need to end to end hiring orchestration across established HR systems. This focus differs from interview security first approaches that prioritize real time behavioral verification.
Pros
The user interface is easy to navigate and speeds setup for recruiting teams. Strong automation and AI features reduce manual screening work and help sort high volumes of applicants. Integrations with major ATS platforms and enterprise grade security make the product suitable for larger HR stacks while candidates report a positive interview experience that supports employer brand.
Cons
- Limited branding customization reported by some customers; pages and emails can feel templated.
- Pricing is quote based, which raises a procurement barrier for smaller teams with fixed budgets.
- Advanced features require time to learn and a formal onboarding process to unlock value.
- The platform is cloud based with limited offline capabilities for low connectivity scenarios.
When It May Not Fit
Jobma may not suit very small teams that have minimal integration needs or simple hiring workflows. Buyers without dedicated onboarding resources could find the advanced modules hard to adopt quickly. Those who need offline or local client support should look elsewhere.
Notable Integrations
Jobma connects with Workday, Oracle, iCIMS, Greenhouse, BambooHR, Jobvite, and Lever. These integrations allow vendor side scheduling, applicant sync, and result posting back into existing ATS pipelines.
Who It's For
Mid sized and large organizations, corporate HR teams, and recruitment agencies that run high volume hiring will get the most from Jobma. The product fits teams that already use enterprise ATS systems and need compliant, automated screening. Smaller teams with limited IT or integration needs may find it more than they require.
Real World Use Case
A multinational used Jobma to screen thousands of applicants every month through automated AI interviews and technical assessments. The vendor reported that reduction in time to hire after the ATS integration and automation were in place. Recruiting operations cut manual review hours while retaining structured assessment data in the ATS.
Pricing
Pricing is custom and based on volume and feature needs, available by request quote. The vendor typically scopes enterprise contracts rather than offering public starter tiers. Prospective buyers should contact sales for a tailored proposal and implementation estimate.
Website: https://jobma.com
HyreFast
At a Glance
A free trial includes 25 credits for live tests and candidate submissions. HyreFast collects structured interview responses and pairs them with AI scoring to produce ranked shortlists. The platform emphasizes transparent scoring and evidence such as audio and transcripts to support hiring decisions.
Core Features
HyreFast captures structured candidate answers and stores pre recorded interview audio and full transcripts, which the system uses for analysis. The platform applies AI evaluation to score responses, then produces ranked shortlists with articulated reasoning for each ranking. It can sit alongside an ATS or operate standalone for teams that prefer an interview first workflow.
Key Differentiator
HyreFast centers on AI evaluation of structured responses paired with visible reasoning for each ranking. That combination lets hiring teams compare candidates on the same questions and review the evidence behind every score.
Pros
HyreFast reports that shortlisting can run about 3x faster when teams use structured responses and automated scoring. The platform reduces repetitive screening work by returning ranked candidate lists and detailed reasoning so recruiters spend less time reasking the same questions. Setup is low friction with no mandatory signup and free credits, and pricing offers both prepaid volume packages and pay as you go options for fluctuating hiring volumes.
Cons
- Pricing does not use fixed public tiers. Large volume deals may require a sales conversation.
- The model depends on candidates completing structured responses. Roles that need live interaction or ad hoc tasks may not fit well.
- Buyer feedback raised questions about AI assessment transparency and accuracy, even though many buyers reported improvements in fairness and efficiency.
Who It's For
Recruitment teams, startups, and agencies that want to replace early resume screens with standardized interviews will get the most value. Teams that need objective, comparable evidence for decisions and that can design role specific interview prompts will benefit most. Organizations that require live skill demonstrations may find this approach less suitable.
Real World Use Case
A startup used HyreFast to evaluate more than 150 candidates each week. The team moved screening out of live sessions and relied on ranked shortlists to focus interviews on final contenders. Hiring managers reported clearer comparisons and faster decisions because scores tied directly to recorded responses.
Pricing
A free trial starts with 25 credits for sampling the platform. Pricing then scales with custom prepaid packages or pay as you go volume plans for teams with variable hiring needs. Exact enterprise pricing is available by contacting sales.
Website: https://hyrefast.ai
Comparison of alternatives
Interview screening platforms offer distinct advantages tailored to various recruitment needs. This analysis compares Evy with its main competitors to explore unique features and applications.
Integrity Monitoring Versus Adaptability
Evy specializes in integrity monitoring through calibrated eye tracking technology embedded directly into live interviews, enabling fraud detection by analyzing gaze behavior and audit trail logs. In contrast, Hirevue targets global adaptability with its extensive support for over 40 languages and compliance with international security standards such as ISO/IEC 27001. These features allow multinational firms to streamline cross-region hiring. Smaller teams prioritizing ease of integration or multi-language capabilities may favor Hirevue over Evy.
Regulation and Proctoring Versus Automation
Talview delivers layered fraud detection mechanisms suitable for regulated industries, including options for live, automated, and record-as-you-go proctoring through its Alvy AI Proctor modes. Additionally, this breadth accommodates diverse assessment workflows in compliance-sensitive contexts like licensure exams. Meanwhile, HyreFast emphasizes automation and operational simplicity, offering structured interviews evaluated through AI-generated ranked shortlists—beneficial for startups needing simple, scalable screening without extended configuration periods. Teams weighing regulatory depth against recruitment efficiency may split between these preferences.
Best fit
- Organizations seeking precise fraud detection during remote high-volume screening workflows will benefit most from using Evy.
- Large staffs conducting multilingual interview programs across extensive geographies may favor Hirevue for its centralized language integration and security standards.
- Regulated industries prioritizing compliance with strict protocols should consider Talview to take advantage of its layered proctoring and verification mechanisms.
- Startups aiming for straightforward automation aligned with performance evidence will find HyreFast particularly effective.
Our pick
Evy distinguishes itself through its calibrated eye tracking system integrated into live conversational interviews. This technology ensures higher screening integrity for organizations that prioritize fraud detection alongside results workflows. While Evy’s setup may involve calibration steps, its advanced capabilities answer industry needs for reliable fraud monitoring, positioning Evy as the choice for teams scaling recruitment integrity strategies.
Explore the features, pricing, and key differentiators of top interview proctoring platforms to determine the best solution for your organization's hiring needs.
| Platform | Key Features | Pricing | Ideal Users | Key Limitation |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Evy | Conversational AI interviews, calibrated eye-tracking, and ATS integration | Starting at $8 per interview, discounts for seats | Organizations hiring at scale for integrity-focused roles | Requires candidate eye-tracking calibration |
| Hirevue | AI-powered video interviews, skills assessments, and automation | Price not published | Multinational corporations with compliance needs | Onboarding requires significant time and integration resources |
| Talview | AI behavior monitoring, identity verification, and secure browser | Price not published | High-stakes exams and regulated industries | Potential delay with human-verified escalations |
| Jobma | Video interviews, AI-driven scoring, and ATS integration | Price not published | High-volume recruiting teams using ATS systems | Limited branding customization for interviews |
| HyreFast | AI evaluation with structured interviews and scoring transparency | Free trial with 25 credits, custom quotes after | Small to mid-sized teams needing net screening | Focus on structured interviews not suitable for all scenarios |
How Can You Enhance Interview Integrity with fasthire.io Alternatives?
The article highlights the challenge of detecting candidate dishonesty during AI interviews. For recruiters and talent teams that want strong fraud detection while scaling screening operations, Evy offers a unique solution. Evy uses real-time eye tracking to monitor gaze patterns and full-page activity, catching cheating behaviors that typical platforms might miss. This blend of integrity monitoring and AI-driven interviewing helps hiring teams review honest, qualified talent more confidently.
With pricing starting at $8 per interview and integrations that fit existing ATS systems, Evy supports large volumes without complex contracts. Explore Evy to learn how you can protect your hiring process with calibrated eye tracking and clear audit trails. Start screening candidates at scale and bring transparency into your interview reviews.
FAQ
What makes Evy a good choice for ensuring integrity during interviews?
Evy provides calibrated eye tracking during interviews to record gaze patterns and full-page activity, which helps in integrity monitoring. This feature ensures robust oversight during screening processes, making it a reliable option for teams. Hiring organizations can expect better fraud detection through these measures.
How does Evy compare to Hirevue in terms of candidate engagement?
Hirevue excels in offering a diverse range of interview formats, including video interviews and skill assessments, which enhances candidate engagement. Evy also focuses on candidate engagement by allowing self-scheduling for interviews and integrating with ATS systems. Organizations seeking streamlined engagement with structured follow-up questions from AI will find Evy particularly beneficial.
Which platform offers better pricing for smaller teams, Evy or Jobma?
Evy starts at $8 per interview, making it accessible for organizations looking to screen candidates without large upfront costs, while Jobma's pricing is custom and may pose procurement barriers for smaller teams. Evy's pay-as-you-go model allows teams to manage costs effectively while scaling their screening needs.
Does Evy support ATS integrations?
Evy integrates seamlessly with ATS systems, enabling candidate data to flow into existing HR workflows via API or CSV. This capability ensures that hiring teams can manage recruitment efficiently without additional manual exports.
Is there a significant learning curve for using Evy compared to its competitors?
Evy's user interface is designed for ease of use, allowing teams to operate it effectively without extensive training. This straightforward approach contrasts with some competitors like Talview, which require more extensive onboarding due to their broad feature sets.